Project Jurisprudence
Project Jurisprudence
  • 202
  • 321 183
MACQUILING v. COMELEC (G.R. No. 195649, July 2, 2013)
CASE DIGEST: [G.R. No. 195649, 2 July 2013] CASAN MACODE MACQUILING, PETITIONER, vs. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ROMMEL ARNADO Y CAGOCO, AND LINOG G. BALUA. RESPONDENTS.
BLOG: www.projectjurisprudence.com.
FB: projectjuris.
TW: projectjuris.
YT: ua-cam.com/users/projectjurisprudence.
YT 2: ua-cam.com/users/projectjurisprudence2.
Project Jurisprudence - Philippines (PJP) blogs and re-blogs contents on laws and jurisprudence, including issues regarding government and politics in the Philippines.
Переглядів: 734

Відео

NAVARRO v. ERMITA (G.R. No. 180050, April 12, 2011)
Переглядів 4633 роки тому
CASE DIGEST: [G.R. No. 180050, April 12, 2011] RODOLFO G. NAVARRO, VICTOR F. BERNAL, and RENE O. MEDINA, Petitioners, vs. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY EDUARDO ERMITA, representing the President of the Philippines; Senate of the Philippines, represented by the SENATE PRESIDENT; House of Representatives, represented by the HOUSE SPEAKER; GOVERNOR ROBERT ACE S. BARBERS, representing the mother province of ...
NARROWLY TAILORED FREE SPEECH REGULATIONS
Переглядів 1443 роки тому
READ MORE: www.projectjurisprudence.com/2020/09/narrowly-tailored-free-speech-regulations-freedom-of-expression.html. BLOG: www.projectjurisprudence.com. FB: projectjuris. TW: projectjuris. YT: ua-cam.com/users/projectjurisprudence. YT 2: ua-cam.com/users/projectjurisprudence2. Project Jurisprudence - Philippines (PJP) blogs and re-blogs contents on laws and jurispruden...
CASE DIGEST: NICOLAS-LEWIS v. COMELEC [G.R. No. 223705]
Переглядів 4083 роки тому
CASE DIGEST: [ G.R. No. 223705, August 14, 2019 ] LOIDA NICOLAS-LEWIS, PETITIONER, VS. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, RESPONDENT. DECISION. REYES, J. JR., J.: www.projectjurisprudence.com/2020/09/sc-unconstitutional-sec-36.8-ra-9189-gr-no-223705-august-14-2019-case-digest-nicolas-lewis-v-comelec.html. On grounds of violation of the freedom of speech, of expression, and of assembly; denial of substant...
ONLINE 2020/2021 BAR EXAMS
Переглядів 1,9 тис.3 роки тому
The manner in which the November 2021 Bar examination will be conducted is still being studied but one thing is definite: Bar exam Chair Associate Justice Marvic Leonen said it “will not be conducted as it was before.” (Inquirer) BLOG: www.projectjurisprudence.com. FB: projectjuris. TW: projectjuris. YT: ua-cam.com/users/projectjurisprudence. YT 2: ua-cam.com/users/proj...
13 PRINCIPLES OF DECENTRALIZATION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
Переглядів 1,4 тис.3 роки тому
The formulation and implementation of policies and measures on local autonomy shall be guided by these operative principles. BLOG: www.projectjurisprudence.com. FB: projectjuris. TW: projectjuris. YT: ua-cam.com/users/projectjurisprudence. YT 2: ua-cam.com/users/projectjurisprudence2. Project Jurisprudence - Philippines (PJP) blogs and re-blogs contents on laws and juri...
ZIALCITA V. PAL (RO4-3-3398-76; FEBRUARY 20, 1977)
Переглядів 3433 роки тому
Zialcita v. PAL (RO4-3-3398-76; February 20, 1977). FACTS: Zialcita is a stewardess of PAL. She was fired from work because she had gotten married. PAL argued and cited its policy that stewardesses must be single. The policy also states that subsequent marriage of a stewardess shall automatically terminate employment. READ MORE: www.projectjurisprudence.com/2018/05/zialcita-v-pal-ro4-3-3398-76-...
CASE DIGEST: LA SUERTE CIGAR VS. CA (G.R. NO. 125346; NOVEMBER 11, 2014)
Переглядів 4713 роки тому
CASE DIGEST: LA SUERTE CIGAR & CIGARETTE FACTORY, Petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondents. (G.R. No. 125346; November 11, 2014). READ MORE: www.projectjurisprudence.com/2018/08/case-digest-la-suerte-cigar-vs-ca-gr-no-125346-november-11-2014.html. BLOG: www.projectjurisprudence.com. FB: projectjuris. TW: projectjuris. YT: ua-cam...
TAÑADA v. TUVERA (G.R. No. 63915, December 29, 1986)
Переглядів 2,9 тис.3 роки тому
Due process was invoked by the petitioners in demanding the disclosure of a number of presidential decrees which they claimed had not been published as required by law. The government argued that while publication was necessary as a rule, it was not so when it was "otherwise provided," as when the decrees themselves declared that they were to become effective immediately upon their approval. RE...
President’s restricted powers as Commander-in-Chief
Переглядів 2793 роки тому
READ MORE: www.projectjurisprudence.com/2020/09/presidents-restricted-powers-as.html. (I. Cortes, The Philippine Presidency: A Study of Executive Power, pp. 68-69; cited in Sanlakas v. Executive Secretary et al., G.R. Nos. 159086, 159103, 159185, 159196, 3 February 2004) BLOG: www.projectjurisprudence.com. FB: projectjuris. TW: projectjuris. YT: ua-cam.com/users/project...
CASE DIGEST: ANG LADLAD V. COMELEC (G.R. NO. 190582; APRIL 8, 2010)
Переглядів 2,4 тис.3 роки тому
FACTS: Ang Ladlad is an organization composed of men and women who identify themselves as lesbians, gays, bisexuals, or trans-gendered individuals (LGBTs). Incorporated in 2003, Ang Ladlad first applied for registration with the COMELEC in 2006. The application for accreditation was denied on the ground that the organization had no substantial membership base. On August 17, 2009, Ang Ladlad aga...
CASE DIGEST: RAMISCAL V. SANDIGANBAYAN (G.R. NO. 172476-99)
Переглядів 2533 роки тому
CASE DIGEST: BRIG GEN. (RET.) JOSE RAMISCAL, JR. Petitioner, v. SANDIGANBAYAN AND PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondents. FACTS: Petitioner Jose S. Ramiscal, Jr. was a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP), with the rank of Brigadier General. when he served as President of the AFP-Retirement and Separation Benefits System (AFP-RSBS). During petitioner’s term as president ...
JAVELLANA V EXECUTIVE SECRETARY (G.R. No. L-36142)
Переглядів 1,7 тис.3 роки тому
BLOG: www.projectjurisprudence.com. FB: projectjuris. TW: projectjuris. YT: ua-cam.com/users/projectjurisprudence. YT 2: ua-cam.com/users/projectjurisprudence2. Project Jurisprudence - Philippines (PJP) blogs and re-blogs contents on laws and jurisprudence, including issues regarding government and politics in the Philippines.
CASE DIGEST: GSIS V. BERNADAS (G.R. NO. 164731)
Переглядів 2003 роки тому
CASE DIGEST: GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM, Petitioner, v. ROSALINDA A. BERNADAS, Respondent. G.R. No. 164731; February 11, 2010. FACTS: Rosalinda A. Bernadas was a public school teacher at Jibao-an Elementary School, Jibao-an, Pavia, Iloilo City for almost 35 years. On 3 March 2000, she was supervising her students in a gardening activity within the school premises when she accidentally ...
CASE DIGEST: DE GUZMAN V. GONZALEZ III (G.R. NO. 158104)
Переглядів 2733 роки тому
CASE DIGEST: ANGELITA DE GUZMAN, Petitioner, v. EMILIO A. GONZALEZ III, then Officer-In-Charge, Office of the Deputy Ombudsman for Luzon, ADORACION A. AGBADA, Graft Investigator, and Commission on Audit Region II Cagayan, represented by ERLINDA F. LANGCAY, HON. LEO REYES, Presiding Judge of Regional Trial Court of Sanchez Mira, Cagayan, Respondents. G.R. No. 158104: March 26, 2010. FACTS: Petit...
PINAUSUKAN SEAFOOD v FAR EAST BANK, G.R. No. 159926, January 20, 2014
Переглядів 8773 роки тому
PINAUSUKAN SEAFOOD v FAR EAST BANK, G.R. No. 159926, January 20, 2014
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CUSTOM AND LAW
Переглядів 1,9 тис.3 роки тому
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CUSTOM AND LAW
CASE DIGEST: LBC v. PALCO G R No 217101, February 12, 2020
Переглядів 8873 роки тому
CASE DIGEST: LBC v. PALCO G R No 217101, February 12, 2020
IBP: Benefits of the 2019 amendments to the rules
Переглядів 7953 роки тому
IBP: Benefits of the 2019 amendments to the rules
2019 RULES ON EVIDENCE - J. PERALTA, JR.
Переглядів 16 тис.4 роки тому
2019 RULES ON EVIDENCE - J. PERALTA, JR.
2019 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (GESMUNDO, J.)
Переглядів 13 тис.4 роки тому
2019 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (GESMUNDO, J.)
2019 AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Переглядів 10 тис.4 роки тому
2019 AMENDMENTS TO THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Maltreating prisoners; abusing chastity
Переглядів 2714 роки тому
Maltreating prisoners; abusing chastity
Part 2 Basic Legal Ethics
Переглядів 1,4 тис.4 роки тому
Part 2 Basic Legal Ethics
Intentional and negligent crimes
Переглядів 2684 роки тому
Intentional and negligent crimes
Death related crimes
Переглядів 1464 роки тому
Death related crimes
Civil Procedure - Jurisdiction, multiple causes of action (Part 8)
Переглядів 4,4 тис.4 роки тому
Civil Procedure - Jurisdiction, multiple causes of action (Part 8)
Part 1: Basic Legal Ethics
Переглядів 5 тис.4 роки тому
Part 1: Basic Legal Ethics
Contracts law (Part 1)
Переглядів 1,2 тис.4 роки тому
Contracts law (Part 1)
TAX exemption, amnesty, compromise, compensation and interpretation
Переглядів 7504 роки тому
TAX exemption, amnesty, compromise, compensation and interpretation

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @kennybayudan5616
    @kennybayudan5616 День тому

    Napaka walang kwentang argumento. What he's saying is yung to officials lang ang dapat proven integrity. Lower ranks, walang pake ang osg. Quo warranto is to question the qualifications. Anong batas kaya yan na pwede sa impeachable officers. Legal aberration

  • @ghelotuazon158
    @ghelotuazon158 2 дні тому

    One day Sereno will get the justice she deserved.

  • @ghelotuazon158
    @ghelotuazon158 2 дні тому

    Sereno lead the Judiciary way better. De Castro is a hungry insecure justice and bias from the start.

  • @Nirnek
    @Nirnek 3 дні тому

    Tanga mo De Castro 😂😂

  • @ghelotuazon158
    @ghelotuazon158 14 днів тому

    De castro is having a hard time with downloading and technology

  • @ghelotuazon158
    @ghelotuazon158 14 днів тому

    Shame on you Justice De Castro. Greedy person.

  • @jackaquines4473
    @jackaquines4473 Місяць тому

    Irenethoughtcsrpotiethegost😂😂😂

  • @user-sk1pw7mq4z
    @user-sk1pw7mq4z Місяць тому

    Di marunong mag cross examine si decastro..

  • @user-sk1pw7mq4z
    @user-sk1pw7mq4z Місяць тому

    Ay nako de castro..

  • @user-sk1pw7mq4z
    @user-sk1pw7mq4z Місяць тому

    Sereno speaks english well compared to de castro

  • @vjtv2509
    @vjtv2509 Місяць тому

    magaling yung pagsagot n cj sereno, kaya quo warranto ang gnamit nila para yung mga ayaw na mahistrado kay sereno boboto lang pabor sa quo warranto para mpaalis sya s pwesto, pero kung impeachment ang gnamit nil mahihirapan silng m convict si sereno dhl wala silang makitang ebedinsyang nakaw na yaman.

  • @deebeedeetv1902
    @deebeedeetv1902 2 місяці тому

    Pwede namang mag-tagalog bakit hindi ito gamitin? Para mas maintindihan ng taumbayan. Nakakainis minsan ang mga ganito kc yun naman ang layunin natin....na dapat maintindihan tayo ng lahat ke may aral man o wala.

  • @levis501strauss
    @levis501strauss 2 місяці тому

    Sa edad ni de castro naintindihan ko sya.

  • @user-mt5mv3eq6z
    @user-mt5mv3eq6z 3 місяці тому

    Thank you atty.

  • @bahkeru645
    @bahkeru645 3 місяці тому

    Sereno is unfit to be CJ

  • @francisyam2219
    @francisyam2219 3 місяці тому

    How cj sereno defended herself gracefully.

  • @chubbydawme
    @chubbydawme 3 місяці тому

    De casteo gigil na gigil!

  • @thefilipinochristian6806
    @thefilipinochristian6806 3 місяці тому

    Sereno was just a casualty of Noynoy's whims and caprices. After Noynoy ordered the removal of CJ Corona due to the SC decision on Aquino's Hacienda Luisita, here is his appointed "CJ" also removed. Payback time is real.

    • @vaccariaofsamsara
      @vaccariaofsamsara 3 місяці тому

      Karma is real indeed. And Panot died lonely in his residence, only a katulong was present.

    • @jasperalfonso8281
      @jasperalfonso8281 3 місяці тому

      So u consider being alone as karma?

  • @SamanthaNicole-yc4ht
    @SamanthaNicole-yc4ht 4 місяці тому

    Butata de Castro h ag haha

  • @oliverjamesdulay439
    @oliverjamesdulay439 4 місяці тому

    Duterte never filed his SALN.

  • @migsmagallon
    @migsmagallon 4 місяці тому

    paano kaya naging justice itong si de castro?

  • @migsmagallon
    @migsmagallon 4 місяці тому

    nakakagigil si De Castro, very selective. Sooo unfair.

  • @user-sc2iv6pc4f
    @user-sc2iv6pc4f 4 місяці тому

    Bobo yan si de Castro... . Kupal yan😂

  • @jakearki4941
    @jakearki4941 5 місяців тому

    Sana maging senadora si CJ Sereno

  • @karstinfrane8469
    @karstinfrane8469 5 місяців тому

    They need to use Quo Warranto because they know that they will lose against Sereno in impeachment. Injustic De Castro - kating-kati maging CJ in a dirty manner.

  • @jakearki4941
    @jakearki4941 6 місяців тому

    CJ Sereno bright and beautiful. I love how she rebut and build defenses to ill statements of De Castro.

  • @barrientosrenie321
    @barrientosrenie321 6 місяців тому

    hahahahahahahaha... SOLGEN CALIDA ay isa sa mga pillars at association ng mga Ddshizt ni Rodrigo Duterte noon pa at hanggang ngayun na may sekretong ugnayan kay Quiboloy, Atty. Gadon, PAO Chief Acosta, at Associate Justice Castro na nasa likod at palihim na inaatake si CJ Sereno para sa impeachment proceedings sapagkat ang pakay ng mga ddshits pillars ay matanggal si CJ Sereno sa pwesto sa Supreme Court at ang italaga ni Rodrigo Duterte ay mga tauhan nia or appointees niya. Kaya ngayun, ito ang kanilang taktika ngayun para ang mamumuno sa bansa natin ay may halong ubod ng kasinungalingan, anumalya, patayan sa advocacy of drug-war ni Rodrigo Duterte at palihim o nakakubling drug business o drug shipment sa Davao ni Rodrigo Duterte na dapat malaman ng karamihan ito. Si SOLGEN CALIDA rin ay may akda o pakana sa pagpapabagsak ng prangkisa ng ABSCBN na naging sanhi ng pagsara nito at libo libong nawalan ng trabaho lalong lalo na sa kasagsagan ng pandemya COVID, at right timing talaga kasi noong pandemya, doon nakakuha ng tamang chimpo si Rodrigo Duterte kung saan naganap na sarit saring anumalya sa loob ng kanyang administration na nagpapahirap sa buong bansa sa dahilang maraming nagsara na kompanya ng dahiol sa sistema o control ni Rodrigo Duterte sa bansa.

  • @barrientosrenie321
    @barrientosrenie321 6 місяців тому

    Si Associate De Castro ay nagmumukhang squatter kung magsalita na parang struggly enforcing and insisting the insufficiency of Associate Sereno for the persecution of the impeachment. Well! no doubt that De Castro is one of the pillars to be associated by Rodrigo Duterte. Rodrigo Duterte has used and utilized De Castro as an instrument to put the CJ Sereno down. Obviously, the Ddshitz like Castro sounds avenging to find other ways to oust CJ Sereno. #ACTION SPEAKS LOUDER THAN WORDS.... In addition to this, Associate de Castro has clearly a connection to Atty. Gadon initially processed and executes the petition for impeachment being filed against CJ Sereno. Now, in other words, the pillars of the Ddshizt are quite several manifested and identified in which their moves against CJ Sereno are definitely politically ground.

  • @Amir-Hazsann
    @Amir-Hazsann 6 місяців тому

  • @lloydbendulo1072
    @lloydbendulo1072 6 місяців тому

    It's not the fault of sereno I think the jbc has a full accountability for that.the jbc approved her application even there's some discrepancy with her application

  • @user-uy7db4xp6k
    @user-uy7db4xp6k 6 місяців тому

    NDI klaro boses mo!

  • @UltimateTruthsAndWorldviews
    @UltimateTruthsAndWorldviews 7 місяців тому

    1:51 Note: G.R. No. 181303 September 17, 2009 CARMEN DANAO MALANA, et al. v. BENIGNO TAPPA, et al. It is important to note that Section 1, Rule 63 of the Rules of Court does not categorically require that an action to quiet title be filed before the RTC. It repeatedly uses the word "may" - that an action for quieting of title "may be brought under [the] Rule" on petitions for declaratory relief, and a person desiring to file a petition for declaratory relief "may x x x bring an action in the appropriate Regional Trial Court." The use of the word "may" in a statute denotes that the provision is merely permissive and indicates a mere possibility, an opportunity or an option.23 In contrast, the mandatory provision of the Judiciary Reorganization Act of 1980, as amended, uses the word "shall" and explicitly requires the MTC to exercise exclusive original jurisdiction over all civil actions which involve title to or possession of real property where the assessed value does not exceed ₱20,000.00, thus: Section 33. Jurisdiction of Metropolitan Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts and Municipal Circuit Trial Courts in Civil Cases.-Metropolitan Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts and Municipal Circuit Trial Courts shall exercise: x x x x (3) Exclusive original jurisdiction in all civil actions which involve title to, possession of, real property, or any interest therein where the assessed value of the property or interest therein does not exceed Twenty thousand pesos (₱20,000.00) or, in civil actions in Metro Manila, where such assessed value does not exceeds Fifty thousand pesos (₱50,000.00) exclusive of interest, damages of whatever kind, attorney’s fees, litigation expenses and costs: x x x (Emphasis ours.)

  • @ivyvergara2329
    @ivyvergara2329 8 місяців тому

    Good afternoon po chief of Justice salamat po godbless po sa lahat ng mga judge

  • @user-bt1rr5cr8w
    @user-bt1rr5cr8w 9 місяців тому

    Hahaha. Para KAYONG mga baliw na baliw SI PPRD SI SARAH DNTERTE. PINAGTATAWANAN. LANG KAYO . MGA BOBO TALAGA KAYO ANG INAKYSAHAN NYO GUSTO NYO IPAKULONG PINATAGTATAWANAN LANG KAYO word na TAMBALOSLOS AUIDIT NANGINGINIG NA KAYO Jan Feb Mar Apr BAYARAN ng BUHIS if MINDANAO default to pay taxes and follow DUTERTE'S CALL and 50 percent income in our country came from MINDANAO HOW COULD MARCOS TO GOVERN OUR COUNTRY WITH SMALL AMOUNT OF MONEY??? hahahaha. Mga bobo

  • @edgarsy1990
    @edgarsy1990 9 місяців тому

    Gusto palang maging CJ kaya nagpagamit sa mga masasama sa gobyerno.

    • @karstinfrane8469
      @karstinfrane8469 5 місяців тому

      Para siyang asong feeling inaagawan ng pagkain.

  • @edgarsy1990
    @edgarsy1990 9 місяців тому

    labanan ng panig sa masama at mabuting gobyerno.

  • @patabantecalisura
    @patabantecalisura 11 місяців тому

    You guys sounds so nervous....specially de Castro...why?

  • @BenedictSy-dg6kk
    @BenedictSy-dg6kk Рік тому

    Lol

  • @rainb5987
    @rainb5987 Рік тому

    Bringing out polyamory and incest may be an indication of strawman argument or worse slippery slope. We have a line for that: "Compelling State Interest (CSI) Test" Fundamental rights are not absolute and it can be prohibited/regulated if the state has a compelling state interest. CSI deals with regulation out of necessity rather than preference. For example, the Supreme Court recently upheld the Constitutionality of Anti-Terror Law because there is a need for stronger regulation against terrorism although it might trample freedom of expression, assembly and press. On the other hand, the Supreme Court exempted religious people (conscientious objector) from the penal application of RH law because it violates Freedom of Religion and there is no CSI to penalize them. So far, there is a CSI in prohibiting incestous marriage since it almost results to children with genetic defect. But there is no CSI to regulate polygamy since Presidential Decree 1083 already legalized it among Muslims plus rampant infidelity among non-Muslims. Or maybe there is CSI that has yet to be determined. Certainly, there is no CSI against same-sex marriage.

  • @bosskalakal
    @bosskalakal Рік тому

    Hajajjaa na prove talaga kng cnu butata....galing

  • @jamesgo2014
    @jamesgo2014 Рік тому

    Eloquently after eloquently...

  • @kennybayudan5616
    @kennybayudan5616 Рік тому

    😂😂😂😂😂 The interpellator cannot accept the rebuttals even though it made sense by the word and the spirit of the law.

  • @celiatomczyk8694
    @celiatomczyk8694 Рік тому

    Then apply that to duterte and marcos

  • @mathtalinohelper9016
    @mathtalinohelper9016 Рік тому

    Sereno outsmart DE Castro... De castro has no brain uwi kana kaya...I hate De Castro she has no manner BASTOS!!!!!!!!!! DI nya kc matanggap na mas matalino c Sereno sa kanya kya paepal tseeeeee

  • @ashransappayani9533
    @ashransappayani9533 Рік тому

    Supalpal si De Castro! HAHAHAHAHA

  • @edwardgeorgedevera9769
    @edwardgeorgedevera9769 Рік тому

    Masakit nangyari kay Serreno kasi isinuka aiya ng mga colleagues niya sa supreme court. Si Corona naman ay sa congress at senate upon the influence of Pnoy.

  • @edwardgeorgedevera9769
    @edwardgeorgedevera9769 Рік тому

    Simply put the JBC was remissed in their duty to conduct careful screening of all candidates for CJ position. That however does not excuse Serreno from complying with the SALN law especially so that she is applying for the highest post in the judiciary.

  • @edwardgeorgedevera9769
    @edwardgeorgedevera9769 Рік тому

    Parehong magaling pero halatang nagpapalusot lang si Serreno.

  • @edwardgeorgedevera9769
    @edwardgeorgedevera9769 Рік тому

    The actions of the Supreme Court employees and court employees nationwide are very telling. During the Corona impeachnent, they all went out of their way to show their support for CJ Corona. However, for CJ Serreno, no support was manifested by court personnel. What does it say of Serreno's leadership?

  • @virgiliodelosreyes9851
    @virgiliodelosreyes9851 Рік тому

    I salute you , cj sereno you arenext to miriam iron lady